Since Hurricanes Katrina and Rita slammed into the Gulf Coast in 2005, home insurance has become a huge issue for states like Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas and Florida. In fact hurricane concerns even plague New York, where experts say a storm is long overdue to slam Long Island. Now the question arises between personal rights and personal responsibilities – who pays the enormous insurance costs for people living along the coastline?
Thousands of homes were destroyed by the storms, and now insurance companies are reticent to insure those areas again because there is little that can be done to mitigate the risk. Subsequently coastal economies are threatened. “As you know, if you can’t insure it, you can’t finance it,†Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour told the Associated Press, “And normally, if you can’t finance it, you can’t build it.â€Â
State-sponsored insurance pools have stepped in with hundreds of millions of dollars to help insurance companies underwrite the cost of home insurance in many states. This has worked well most recently in Florida, where a huge pool of funds enticed eight additional insurance carriers back to the Sunshine State. But the state pools still aren’t enough, and many are pushing for an expensive federal program.
Here’s the rub – in many areas, like exclusive parts of Texas, the coast is lined with expensive homes that regularly get destroyed and replaced by the flood insurance program at taxpayer cost. It’s the same case in Florida and other coastal states. As William Berkley, chairman of the board and CEO of W. R. Berkley Corp said, “It’s just plain silly to provide subsidies to insure million-dollar-plus houses along the oceans and the bays.â€Â   Is it right for me, as a taxpayer in Colorado, to subsidize the replacement of expensive homes I can’t even dream about, just because someone wants to live there? To carry this further, since there is no way to prevent another hurricane from devastating New Orleans, should all those homes be rebuilt?
I understand that for many people, those ravaged areas are home, and they want to go back. Yet the fact remains that they lived in a very fragile, vulnerable area, and it’s simply too great a risk for the government to accept when there are so many other demands on our economy. I would rather put that same money into things like education or health care, rather than rebuild in a problem area. Government funds – translation: tax dollars from you and me – are not inexhaustible. We must spend them as wisely as possible, and asking the government to subsidize the risk of rebuilding in danger zones is not wise.Â
This is a free country, and people have the right to live wherever they want. People do not have the right, however, to ask someone else to pay for it. If you can afford to pay your own way and live on the coast, enjoy. If you cannot afford to pay your own way, you may need to find a new home somewhere else. Sometimes you just have to walk away. This could be one of those times.